The interaction between social protection and conflict is an emerging area of study with particular relevance to the Horn of Africa, where conflict and political instability are habitual risks and where social protection is now a well-established field of intervention, including in response to climate-related shocks. Yet the connection between these two policy areas is poorly articulated. While frontline practitioners may be acutely aware of, and responsive to, conflict and political dynamics, these are less well reflected in the frameworks that guide social protection policy and programming. Where conflict is considered, it tends to be as a discrete shock rather than a chronic condition – the purpose being primarily to avoid doing further harm. The three country case studies on which this paper draws, along with a preliminary investigation of the literature, suggest a number of ways in which development partners could use their resources and leverage to strengthen the conflict sensitivity of social protection at both a strategic and operational level. A useful first step would be to facilitate deeper and more inclusive conversations on how social protection could engage with conflict dynamics in a more explicit and sustained way, with a view to making a positive contribution to peace in fragile contexts.