• Login
    View Item 
    •   OpenDocs Home
    • Institute of Development Studies Research Repository
    • K4D
    • K4D
    • View Item
    •   OpenDocs Home
    • Institute of Development Studies Research Repository
    • K4D
    • K4D
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Reform of Consociationalism Arrangements in Deeply Divided Societies

    Thumbnail
    Download
    730_Reform of consociationalism arrangements.asd.pdf (414.6Kb)
    Date
    2020-01-13
    Author
    Rohwerder, Brigitte
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Impact
    Abstract
    Consociationalism arrangements, a form of power-sharing, have been used in violently divided societies as a means to end wars and build peace. However, many deeply divided countries have struggled to implement their power-sharing arrangements and the transition to more ‘normal’ politics is difficult. Research into reform of consociationalism arrangements in deeply divided societies is scarce and there is little focus or detail provided about the factors which affect the outcomes of these reforms. The few papers found on the subject are from academic sources. This review synthesises literature on the examples of countries undertaken or are undertaking reform of consociationalism arrangements, especially those which moved towards other forms of democracy. The first section of this report elaborates the term consociationalism and its four key institutional arrangements outlined by Lijphart, the the leading authority on consociationalism: executive power-sharing (grand coalitions representing different societal groups); proportionality rules in political representation; mutual vetoes, allowing communities to contest decisions against their interests; and group autonomy, or right to run their own affairs. The second section of this report outlines several case studies of peace agreement consociationalism arrangements in Northern Ireland, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Lebanon, and Burundi which illustrate the various pathways away from consociationalism arrangements. None of these deeply divided countries has made a full democratic transition away from consociationalism yet, but reforms (and attempts at reforms) have been made to their consociationalism arrangements.
    URI
    https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/15000
    Citation
    Rohwerder, B. (2020). Reform of consociationalism arrangements. K4D Helpdesk Report 730. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.
    Is part of series
    K4D Helpdesk Report;730
    Rights holder
    © DFID - Crown copyright 2020
    Rights details
    https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
    Collections
    • K4D [690]

    About OpenDocs | OpenDocs Policy | Help | Contact Us | Send Feedback | Disclaimer and Cookies
     

     

    Browse

    All of OpenDocsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    About OpenDocs | OpenDocs Policy | Help | Contact Us | Send Feedback | Disclaimer and Cookies