• Login
    View Item 
    •   OpenDocs Home
    • Institute of Development Studies Research Repository
    • The Robert Chambers Archive
    • View Item
    •   OpenDocs Home
    • Institute of Development Studies Research Repository
    • The Robert Chambers Archive
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Poverty research: methodologies, mindsets and multidimensionality

    Thumbnail
    Download
    Wp293 web.pdf (976.5Kb)
    Date
    2007-12
    Author
    Chambers, Robert
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Impact
    Abstract
    After defining key words and listing biases and limitations, this paper seeks to explore linkages between methodologies, mindsets, concepts and perceptions in research on poverty. Risking caricature, three streams, syndromes or paradigms are described: first, reductionist - standardised, non-contextual and quantitative, associated with questionnaire surveys, income-poverty, poverty lines and economic analysis; second, particularistic – idiosyncratic, qualitative and contextual, associated with participant observation, ideas about poverty in cultures and communities and anthropological analysis; and third, participatory – pluralist, interactive and multidimensional, associated with facilitation of poor people’s own analysis, and pioneered by a growing number of innovators. Three approaches to the multidimensionality of poverty have been multidisciplinary teams, composite indicators, and mixed methods. Complementing these, participatory methodologies go further into new ground. In the past decade and a half they have exploded with creative diversity, not least with participatory poverty assessments, methodological innovations for research, face-to-face experiential learning, and local people’s own research. The contrasting mindsets of economics, anthropology and participatory pluralism are reflected in and reinforced by their different forms of representation. The multidimensional nature and linkages of poverty and illbeing can be represented by nets and webs. Participatory methodologies repeatedly surprise, and reveal and illuminate relatively neglected dimensions of poverty and illbeing like seasonality, the places of the poor, the importance of the body, and how these and others interlock. With participatory pluralism, methods can be invented and evolved to fit specific topics. Lessons learnt include the need for enough time for trials and piloting; the critical importance of selection, training and mentoring of facilitators; and how behaviour, attitudes, ethics and quality are linked. Participatory pluralism is part of a quiet methodological revolution that has passed largely unnoticed in disciplinary mainstreams. It is blocked by embedded professional mindsets and habits, and by personal, bureaucratic and institutional resistance and inertia, not least in universities. The questions are whether the future of methodology in poverty research lies now much more with this eclectic, creative and participatory pluralism, and whether this can offer a win-win, a best of all worlds, for all, professionals and people living in poverty alike.
    URI
    https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/399
    Citation
    Chambers, R. (2007) Poverty Research: Methodologies, Mindsets and Multidimensionality, IDS Working Paper 293, Brighton: IDS
    Is part of series
    IDS Working Paper;293
    More details
    http://www.ntd.co.uk/idsbookshop/details.asp?id=1004
    Library catalogue entry
    http://bldscat.ids.ac.uk/cgi-bin/koha/opac-search.pl?q=rn:268449
    Rights details
    http://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/80
    Collections
    • The Robert Chambers Archive [415]

    About OpenDocs | OpenDocs Policy | Help | Contact Us | Send Feedback | Disclaimer and Cookies
     

     

    Browse

    All of OpenDocsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    About OpenDocs | OpenDocs Policy | Help | Contact Us | Send Feedback | Disclaimer and Cookies