• Login
    View Item 
    •   OpenDocs Home
    • Institute of Development Studies Research Repository
    • ESRC STEPS Centre
    • ESRC STEPS Centre
    • View Item
    •   OpenDocs Home
    • Institute of Development Studies Research Repository
    • ESRC STEPS Centre
    • ESRC STEPS Centre
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Socioeconomic development as an intervention against malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Thumbnail
    Download
    17 Socioeconomic development as an intervention against.pdf (891.0Kb)
    Date
    2013-06-19
    Author
    Thompson, John
    Tusting, Lucy S
    Willey, Barbara
    Lucas, Henry
    Kafy, Hmooda T
    Smith, Richard
    Lindsay, Steve W
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Impact
    Abstract
    Background Future progress in tacking malaria mortality will probably be hampered by the development of resistance to drugs and insecticides and by the contraction of aid budgets. Historically, control was often achieved without malariaspecific interventions. Our aim was to assess whether socioeconomic development can contribute to malaria control. Methods We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether the risk of malaria in children aged 0–15 years is associated with socioeconomic status. We searched Medline, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Campbell Library, the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Health Systems Evidence, and the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre evidence library for studies published in English between Jan 1, 1980, and July 12, 2011, that measured socioeconomic status and parasitologically confirmed malaria or clinical malaria in children. Unadjusted and adjusted effect estimates were combined in fixedeffects and random-effects meta-analyses, with a subgroup analysis for different measures of socioeconomic status. We used funnel plots and Egger’s linear regression to test for publication bias. Findings Of 4696 studies reviewed, 20 met the criteria for inclusion in the qualitative analysis, and 15 of these reported the necessary data for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The odds of malaria infection were higher in the poorest children than in the least poor children (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 1∙66, 95% CI 1∙35–2∙05, p<0∙001, I²=68%; adjusted OR 2∙06, 1∙42–2∙97, p<0∙001, I²=63%), an effect that was consistent across subgroups.Interpretation Although we would not recommend discontinuation of existing malaria control efforts, we believe that increased investment in interventions to support socioeconomic development is warranted, since such interventions could prove highly effective and sustainable against malaria in the long term.
    URI
    https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/3784
    Citation
    Tusting, Lucy S., et al. "Socioeconomic development as an intervention against malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis." The Lancet 382.9896 (2013): 963-972.
    More details
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60851-X
    Rights holder
    The Lancet (Elsevier)
    Rights details
    http://www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/IDSOpenDocsStandardTermsOfUse.pdf
    Sponsor
    DFID
    Collections
    • ESRC STEPS Centre [225]

    About OpenDocs | OpenDocs Policy | Help | Contact Us | Send Feedback | Disclaimer and Cookies
     

     

    Browse

    All of OpenDocsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    About OpenDocs | OpenDocs Policy | Help | Contact Us | Send Feedback | Disclaimer and Cookies