Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCabral, Lídia
dc.contributor.authorDevereux, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorNisbett, Nick
dc.contributor.authorMetcalfe, Steve
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Sophie
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-26T13:13:37Z
dc.date.available2023-06-26T13:13:37Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-26
dc.identifier.citationIDS (2023) Pathways to Equitable Food Systems, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, DOI: 10.19088/IDS.2023.024en
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/18028
dc.description.abstractGlobally, our food systems are highly inequitable. In a world with enough food, hunger is becoming normalised for large numbers of people, while diets are worsening and obesity is rising. Racialised minorities are more at risk from obesity than other groups; indigenous communities have poorer diets than majority populations. Many of the 4.5 billion people working in food systems endure low-paid, insecure jobs. Small-scale farmers and women are often the most vulnerable. In rural areas communities can be forced off their land and in urban areas, people on low incomes lack access to good-quality food. These inequities are a result of deliberate choices made by powerful entities, and a product of social and economic norms. But by understanding the power imbalances within food systems and identifying the underlying causes of vulnerability, we believe that it is possible to develop pathways which can tackle these inequities. Bringing together studies from Africa, Europe, Latin America and Asia, this report identifies four ways to address inequities: Place more emphasis on bringing together community- and government level actions which can specifically target inequity. Inequities can be tackled when communities and governments work together, with a shared understanding of what is needed to overcome challenges such as hunger, poor nutrition or low-paid work in the food sector. Pursue multiple approaches to tackling challenges within food systems, rather than investing heavily in single initiatives, which are likely to lack inclusivity and lead to lock-ins. Single ‘solutions’ or innovations can exacerbate inequities rather than addressing them. Pay closer attention to who will benefit most from proposed solutions, challenging initiatives where they do not explicitly support marginalised people. Technological innovations to improve food security usually benefit those who already hold powerful positions, and top-down ‘development’ programmes can often exacerbate inequities. Find spaces for the voices of those suffering from inequity. A lack of democracy in food systems is a core reason for many of the inequities analysed in this report. Challenging the dominance of businesses, and bringing civil society voices into policymaking, are crucial steps.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherInstitute of Development Studiesen
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited and any modifications or adaptations are indicated.en
dc.rights*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en
dc.rights.uri*
dc.subjectNutritionen
dc.titlePathways to Equitable Food Systemsen
dc.typeIDS Research Reporten
dc.rights.holderInstitute of Development Studies (IDS)en
dc.identifier.teamHealth and Nutritionen
dc.identifier.doi10.19088/IDS.2023.024
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-06-26
rioxxterms.versionNAen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.19088/IDS.2023.024en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This is an Open Access report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited 
and any modifications or adaptations are indicated.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This is an Open Access report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited and any modifications or adaptations are indicated.