Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGu, Jing
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Danielle
dc.contributor.authorYu, Jiadan
dc.coverage.spatialChinaen
dc.coverage.spatialUnited Statesen
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-16T11:44:48Z
dc.date.available2021-12-16T11:44:48Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-16
dc.identifier.citationGu, J.; Green, D. and Yu, J. (2021) Building Back Better: Sustainable Development Diplomacy in the Pandemic Era, IDS Research Report 86, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, DOI: 10.19088/IDS.2021.065en
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-78118-896-5
dc.identifier.issn0141-1314
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/17009
dc.description.abstractThis report critically examines the nature of the distinction between traditional inter-state diplomacy and sustainable development diplomacy. It then sets out the institutional changes which are necessary for the achievement of sustainable development diplomacy. Multi-stakeholder partnerships have been identified as a key means of implementation for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Given the increasing centrality of the United States (US)–China relationship in global development cooperation, understanding the modalities of their engagement may provide useful insights into how partnerships may be cultivated and deepened to realise the SDGs. The Covid-19 pandemic and climate change have demonstrated the interconnection of the world, as well as the interconnection of challenges of the world. Sustainable development diplomacy is needed now more than ever to prioritise development strategies of different states and work on common shared challenges. Sustainable development diplomacy can only work when different actors recognise the value of the common goals and are willing to make an effort to accomplish them. Global sustainable development diplomacy requires a stronger policy agenda and greater cohesion. This report explores the idea of sustainable development diplomacy and, through two sectoral case studies, explores the nature, function, and rationale for interactive engagement. The form and structure of multi-actor relationships are a response to complex, trans-border political, social, economic, and environmental challenges which require a more nuanced and varied management approach than narrowly defined state-led development. However, the power dynamics, the modalities, and experiences of engagement that underpin these dynamic relationships, remain understudied, especially with regard to their impact on sustainable development.en
dc.description.sponsorshipForeign, Commonwealth & Development Officeen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherInstitute of Development Studiesen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIDS Research Report;86
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited and any modifications or adaptations are indicated.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectClimate Changeen
dc.subjectGovernanceen
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.titleBuilding Back Better: Sustainable Development Diplomacy in the Pandemic Eraen
dc.typeIDS Research Reporten
dc.rights.holderInstitute of Development Studiesen
dc.identifier.teamBusiness, Markets and the Stateen
dc.identifier.doi10.19088/IDS.2021.065
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten
rioxxterms.versionVoRen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.19088/IDS.2021.065en
rioxxterms.funder.project9ce4e4dc-26e9-4d78-96e9-15e4dcac0642en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This is an Open Access report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited and any modifications or adaptations are indicated.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This is an Open Access report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited and any modifications or adaptations are indicated.