• Login
    View Item 
    •   OpenDocs Home
    • Institute of Development Studies Research Repository
    • Covid-19 Responses for Equity (CORE)
    • Supporting essential economic activity - protecting informal businesses, small producers and women workers
    • View Item
    •   OpenDocs Home
    • Institute of Development Studies Research Repository
    • Covid-19 Responses for Equity (CORE)
    • Supporting essential economic activity - protecting informal businesses, small producers and women workers
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    COVID-19 and Informal Work: Distinct Pathways of Impact and Recovery in 11 Cities Around the World

    Thumbnail
    Download
    WIEGO WP 42 COVID-19 and Informal Work: Distinct Pathways of Impact and Recovery in 11 Cities Around the World (2.737Mb)
    Date
    2021-07
    Author
    Chen, Martha
    Grapsa, Erofili
    Ismail, Ghida
    Rogan, Mike
    Valdivia, Marcela
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Impact
    Abstract
    This paper presents findings from a study on the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on informal workers in 11 cities across 5 regions of the world (Asia, Africa, Latin America, North America and Eastern Europe). A unique feature of the study is that it examines the degree – and pathways – of impact on different sectors of informal workers and, within sectors, by key variables (status in employment, place of work, goods/services provided, and gender). Also, the study provides insights from informal workers in their own words. The paper concludes with common demands for recovery by local organizations of informal workers and a call for a Better New Deal for informal workers. The study methods included a survey questionnaire for informal workers and in-depth interviews with informal worker leaders and organizers as well as representatives of government, civil society and academia. The survey was conducted by mobile phone and collected information on the ability to work, working hours, earnings and sector-specific constraints to livelihoods at three points in time: mid-2020 (June–July) when the survey was carried out and two recall periods – April 2020 (period of peak lockdowns or restrictions in all study cities) and February 2020 (pre-COVID-19 reference period). The survey also collected information on health and safety, food security and hunger, care and other household responsibilities, relief measures and household coping strategies. The study was conducted by local researchers in partnership with local organizations of informal workers in each city. The total sample of just over 2,000 informal workers was drawn from the membership of the local organizations using a purposive quota approach: to reflect the membership in four main sectors (domestic workers, home-based workers, street vendors/market traders and waste pickers) as well as several additional sectors in some cities. The sample was not intended to be representative of informal workers in each city or even of the membership of the local organization. The study findings confirm that the COVID-19 crisis had a major negative impact on work and earnings. In April 2020, during peak lockdowns or restrictions, 74 per cent of informal workers were not able to work. By mid-2020, when the lockdowns or restrictions had been eased to some degree, 21 per cent of informal workers were still not able to work; and the average days of work per week and earnings of those able to work were lower than in February 2020 (pre-COVID-19). The study findings also illustrate how changes in demand, supply, prices, wages or piece rates and other factors impacted specific groups of informal workers: resulting in different degrees of impact on work and earnings. The degree of impact differed between live-in and live-out domestic workers; self-employed and subcontracted home-based workers; street vendors/market traders who sold food versus non-food items; and between waste pickers by city, depending on whether the sites where waste was reclaimed (e.g. dumps and landfills), sorted and stored and/or the dealerships where reclaimed waste was sold were closed or open.
    URI
    https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/16769
    Citation
    Chen, M.; Grapsa, E.; Ismail, G.; Rogan, M. and Valdivia, M. (2021) COVID-19 and Informal Work: Distinct Pathways of Impact and Recovery in 11 Cities Around the World, Manchester: WIEGO
    More details
    https://www.wiego.org/publications/covid-19-and-informal-work-distinct-pathways-impact-and-recovery-11-cities-around
    Rights holder
    WIEGO © 2021
    Rights details
    https://www.wiego.org/using-and-citing-material-wiego
    Sponsor
    IDRC | CRDI
    Collections
    • Supporting essential economic activity - protecting informal businesses, small producers and women workers [109]

    About OpenDocs | OpenDocs Policy | Help | Contact Us | Send Feedback | Disclaimer and Cookies
     

     

    Browse

    All of OpenDocsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    About OpenDocs | OpenDocs Policy | Help | Contact Us | Send Feedback | Disclaimer and Cookies