Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBolton, Laura
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-26T16:50:07Z
dc.date.available2020-11-26T16:50:07Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-11
dc.identifier.citationBolton, L. (2020). Water infrastructure in fragile- and conflict-affected states. K4D Helpdesk Report 912. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/15802
dc.description.abstractThis rapid review examines evidence on the key vulnerabilities in the water infrastructure system in urban and peri-urban areas in fragile and conflict-affected states (FCAS). It also focuses on the practical measures, including nature-based solutions, could be taken to address these vulnerabilities and make water systems in urban and peri-urban areas in FCAS more resilient (particularly to climate change impacts). The key weaknesses identified in water infrastructure systems in urban and peri-urban areas in FCAS are: Internal displacement increases demand for water in urban areas as well as increasing wastewater discharge; Alternative service providers which are unregulated, more expensive and of lower quality; Naturally where the state is not functioning, coordination of water services and funding is lacking; The humanitarian system which supports FCAS can be uncoordinated and changeable; There may be physical damage to infrastructure caused by violence; Emigration of qualified water engineers; In some urban areas in Syria conflict has affected electricity supply which in turn affects water supply; Conflict damages financial sustainability of utilities; More knowledge is required on water quality and processes. Some literature suggests that urban needs are under-recognised as traditionally water projects have focussed on agricultural needs in rural areas and population growth in urban areas needs to be given more consideration. The review notes that practical measures to address increased demand from refugee or internally displaced persons (IDPs) influx is context dependent. This review also finds key recommendations for resilience programming are efficient resource management, making interventions sustainable with prior research and analysis, working more closely with the private sector, and maintaining strong relationships with communities.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFCDO (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherInstitute of Development Studiesen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesK4D Helpdesk Report;912
dc.rights.urihttps://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/en
dc.subjectGovernanceen
dc.subjectRightsen
dc.subjectWateren
dc.titleWater Infrastructure in Fragile- and Conflict-Affected Statesen
dc.typeHelpdesken
dc.rights.holder© Crown copyright 2020en
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-11-11
rioxxterms.funderDepartment for International Development, UK Governmenten
rioxxterms.identifier.projectK4Den
rioxxterms.versionVoRen
rioxxterms.funder.project238a9fa4-fe4a-4380-996b-995f33607ba0en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • K4D [937]
    K4D supports learning and the use of evidence to improve the impact of development policy and programmes. The programme is designed to assist the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) and other partners to be innovative and responsive to rapidly changing and complex development challenges.

Show simple item record