Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEnfield, Sue
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-19T13:40:07Z
dc.date.available2020-11-19T13:40:07Z
dc.date.issued2020-11
dc.identifier.citationEnfield, S. (2020). Social policies and Continental Commitments to reducing poverty and inequality in Africa. K4D Helpdesk Report. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/15789
dc.description.abstractThis report synthesises evidence on Africa’s social policies/ continental commitments towards reducing poverty and inequality, including progress that the continent has made towards SDG targets and the effectiveness of regional bodies with the remit to promote progress on regional issues. Continental commitments made to address poverty and inequality across Africa sometimes a decade earlier, now exist in an arena where the focus of development is firmly on the Sustainable Development Goals. These are a holistic agenda for development of all countries and already contain the principle of “leave no one behind”. Nation States have made commitments to work towards Sustainable Development Goals and targets; reporting against these comes from national level data. International development architecture that supports national governments is dominated by UN agencies and driven in particular by the UN Economic Commission for Africa (UN ECA) whose strength derives from its role as the only UN agency mandated to operate at the regional and subregional levels, to harness resources and bring them to bear on Africa's priorities. African institutions derive legitimacy from the African Union (of all 55 member states) and drive Africa’s growth and economic development. Eight sub regional bodies are the building blocks of the African Economic Community (established in 1991) which provides the overarching framework for continental economic integration. To some extent there is a ‘missing middle’ between global/continental targets framed by UN or AU goals and country level national development policy and plans which address those same targets. The predominance of reporting against UN goals and programmes over AU initiatives and frameworks illustrates this. Although in theory several policy positions are crafted at subregional level and then advocated for by subregional blocks, and in a reverse process agreements at AU level will often be analysed at sub-regional level before being domesticated this report has not been able to identify reporting that tracks implementation against regional plans or considers efficacy of this process.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFCDO (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherInstitute of Development Studiesen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesK4D Helpdesk Report;917
dc.rights.urihttps://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/en
dc.subjectPovertyen
dc.subjectRightsen
dc.subjectSocial Protectionen
dc.titleSocial Policies and Continental Commitments to Reducing Poverty and Inequality in Africaen
dc.typeHelpdesken
dc.rights.holder© Crown copyright 2020en
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-11
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen
rioxxterms.funderDepartment for International Development, UK Governmenten
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten
rioxxterms.identifier.projectK4Den
rioxxterms.versionVoRen
rioxxterms.funder.projectd218e59e-c0fb-4cb3-8a07-92a57da72cd1en
rioxxterms.funder.project238a9fa4-fe4a-4380-996b-995f33607ba0en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • K4D [709]
    K4D supports learning and the use of evidence to improve the impact of development policy and programmes. The programme is designed to assist the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) and other partners to be innovative and responsive to rapidly changing and complex development challenges.

Show simple item record