Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWalsh, Alex
dc.contributor.authorBoustati, Alma
dc.coverage.spatialNorth Africaen
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-13T15:40:32Z
dc.date.available2020-11-13T15:40:32Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-18
dc.identifier.citationWalsh, Alex and Boustati, Alma. (2020) Trade Integration in North Africa: Impediments and Opportunities. K4D Helpdesk Report. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/15775
dc.description.abstractThis review synthesises evidence on the barriers to regional cooperation in North Africa on trade and market integration. This review focuses on impediments to trade integration, taking a deeper dive on the effects of state-business relations and the Algeria-Morocco relationship. It concludes by relaying some possibilities for integration in terms of governance and industries. North Africa has the lowest level of regional trade integration in the world with significant lost opportunity in terms of trade growth. Reasons for this poor performance are plentiful, covering tariff and non-tariff measures, poor infrastructure, intra and inter-state conflicts, diverging political economies and state-business relations, and the ‘hub and spoke’ trade arrangement that prioritises trade with Europe. The literature identified for this review is current, with most sources from 2016 until the present. It is strongest in identifying impediments to integration. It is weaker on the real-world effects of business-state relations, even while it presents a good theoretical framework. The literature makes a clear explanation for the state of Algeria-Morocco relations and how it impedes integration. It is somewhat better in terms of identifying opportunities for integration. In terms of geographical coverage, the Maghreb countries are best addressed compared to the region as a whole; questions around Libyan integration into the region are not well treated and may be occluded by the issues connected to the ongoing conflict. Quality of evidence is mixed; empirical studies rely heavily on imperfect or limited data and qualitative studies vary in their level of nuance and relevance.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFCDO (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherInstitute of Development Studiesen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesK4D Helpdesk Report;888
dc.rights.urihttps://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/en
dc.subjectEconomic Developmenten
dc.subjectGovernanceen
dc.subjectTradeen
dc.titleTrade Integration in North Africa: Impediments and Opportunitiesen
dc.typeHelpdesken
dc.rights.holder© Crown copyright 2020en
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-09-18
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen
rioxxterms.funderDepartment for International Development, UK Governmenten
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten
rioxxterms.identifier.projectK4Den
rioxxterms.versionVoRen
rioxxterms.funder.projectd218e59e-c0fb-4cb3-8a07-92a57da72cd1en
rioxxterms.funder.project238a9fa4-fe4a-4380-996b-995f33607ba0en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • K4D [687]
    K4D supports learning and the use of evidence to improve the impact of development policy and programmes. The programme is designed to assist the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) and other partners to be innovative and responsive to rapidly changing and complex development challenges.

Show simple item record