Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTull, Kerina
dc.coverage.spatialDRCen
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-08T09:36:58Z
dc.date.available2019-01-08T09:36:58Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-05
dc.identifier.citationTull, K. (2018). Social protection measures for increasing access to health services. K4D Helpdesk Report 489. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studiesen
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/14243
dc.description.abstractSocial protection is concerned with preventing, managing, and overcoming situations that adversely affect people’s well-being. According to the World Bank (2013) social protection in health (SPH) mechanisms are public interventions that assist households and communities to better manage financial risks caused by health expenditure, as well as provide support to the critical poor. Various social protection interventions have been used to support the most vulnerable to access health facilities at individual, community or health service levels. Successful examples in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) include cash transfers, vouchers, and mutual health insurance. Many aid interventions can also be classified as forms of social protection, and the attention given to this sector is increasing (Weijs et al., 2012). The review finds that utilisation of health services in the DRC is low, particularly in rural areas - more than 30 million Congolese do not have access to quality healthcare (Richard et al., 2017). In addition to this, another key finding worth discussing is that there are two social security measures in the DRC: (i) Compulsory membership for employees in the state body in charge of social security (L'Institut National de Sécurité Sociale, or INSS), or (ii) Membership by choice in a mutual health insurance scheme. Furthermore, cash transfers were the more cost-effective modality in research on internally displaced households paying health expenses in eastern DRC (Evans and Popova, 2014; Aker, 2017); they also improved the outcome of children treated for severe acute malnourishment (Grellety et al., 2017). Accordingly, many international aid agencies are in favour of using vouchers in the DRC context for access to primary health care services (UNICEF, 2012; Aker, 2017; UNHCR, 2018), however ODI research shows aid agencies still have further to go in embedding cash transfers within their systems and cultures (Bailey, 2017).en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherIDSen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesK4D Helpdesk Report;489
dc.rights.urihttps://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/en
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectRightsen
dc.subjectSocial Protectionen
dc.titleSocial Protection Measures for Increasing Access to Health Servicesen
dc.typeOtheren
dc.rights.holder© DFID - Crown copyright 2018.en
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-11-05
rioxxterms.funderDepartment for International Development, UK Governmenten
rioxxterms.identifier.projectK4Den
rioxxterms.versionVoRen
rioxxterms.funder.project238a9fa4-fe4a-4380-996b-995f33607ba0en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • K4D [696]
    K4D supports learning and the use of evidence to improve the impact of development policy and programmes. The programme is designed to assist the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) and other partners to be innovative and responsive to rapidly changing and complex development challenges.

Show simple item record