Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorManis, Athanasios
dc.coverage.spatialSyriaen
dc.coverage.spatialUkraineen
dc.coverage.spatialUgandaen
dc.coverage.spatialKenyaen
dc.coverage.spatialThe Philippinesen
dc.coverage.spatialHaitien
dc.coverage.spatialBangladeshen
dc.coverage.spatialYemenen
dc.coverage.spatialNigeriaen
dc.coverage.spatialSudanen
dc.coverage.spatialMalien
dc.coverage.spatialCentral African Republicen
dc.coverage.spatialNepalen
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-21T13:09:58Z
dc.date.available2018-12-21T13:09:58Z
dc.date.issued2018-09
dc.identifier.citationManis, A. (2018). Cost-effectiveness in humanitarian aid: Localisation programming. K4D Helpdesk. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studiesen
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/14217
dc.description.abstractThere is consensus in the humanitarian aid literature that localisation costs less and can have greater impact on areas in need because the staff of local and national actors cost less compared to the staff of international actors and because staff of local and national actors are more aware of local contexts offering tailor-made solutions. However, the literature does not provide robust evidence showing how localisation is cost-effective. The only tangible evidence relates to particular case studies, such as Myanmar and DRC (Groupe URD, 2017) and Philippines and Nepal (Islamic Relief, 2017). In these cases, the cost of national and local responses was significantly lower and the results very positive. The key elements the success was that the staff of the local actors cost less, were easily deployed, and had good knowledge of the cultural context they were operating in. The literature is more concerned with how localisation, which is accepted as the optimal solution for humanitarian aid in cost-effectiveness terms, can function to the highest international standards and have greater impact on the ground (Oxfam, 2017; Saferworld, 2018). The literature mainly debates facilitating and enabling factors for the overall effectiveness of localisation (Building Markets, 2018; Global Mentoring Initiative, 2018) and what can possibly hinder it or even tarnish its positive image (Oxfam, 2017). Accordingly, the literature focuses on establishing a conflict sensitive approach vis-à-vis the promotion of localisation given that good knowledge of the local context and good access to conflict areas might come with the danger that local actors become part of the conflict as they might well have certain preferences, interests and biases (Oxfam, 2017; Saferworld, 2018). The literature also discusses which local actors specifically can be the most effective, with some reports arguing that international actors should be open to the idea of collaborating with informal local actors under certain conditions (Overseas Development Institute, 2018). Finally, the literature refers to other advantages of localisation, such as access and agility in difficult or unsafe areas (Groupe URD, 2017; Humanitarian Policy Group, 2018) that are not directly related to cost-effectiveness, but do relate to the belief that local and national actors can be more effective and impactful in areas of humanitarian need.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherIDSen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesK4D Helpdesk Report;460
dc.rights.urihttps://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/en
dc.subjectAiden
dc.subjectDevelopment Policyen
dc.subjectEconomic Developmenten
dc.subjectGovernanceen
dc.subjectPopulationen
dc.subjectRightsen
dc.titleCost-Effectiveness in Humanitarian Aid: Localisation Programmingen
dc.typeOtheren
dc.rights.holder© DFID - Crown copyright 2018.en
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-09
rioxxterms.funderDepartment for International Development, UK Governmenten
rioxxterms.identifier.projectK4Den
rioxxterms.versionVoRen
rioxxterms.funder.project238a9fa4-fe4a-4380-996b-995f33607ba0en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • K4D [660]
    K4D supports learning and the use of evidence to improve the impact of development policy and programmes. The programme is designed to assist the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) and other partners to be innovative and responsive to rapidly changing and complex development challenges.

Show simple item record