Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMikulak, Magdalena
dc.coverage.spatialJordanen
dc.coverage.spatialZimbabween
dc.coverage.spatialKenyaen
dc.coverage.spatialSomaliaen
dc.coverage.spatialMalawien
dc.coverage.spatialYemenen
dc.coverage.spatialEcuadoren
dc.coverage.spatialCambodiaen
dc.coverage.spatialMexicoen
dc.coverage.spatialSri Lankaen
dc.coverage.spatialBangladeshen
dc.coverage.spatialDRCen
dc.coverage.spatialThe Philippinesen
dc.coverage.spatialNepalen
dc.coverage.spatialMozambiqueen
dc.coverage.spatialNigeren
dc.coverage.spatialPakistanen
dc.coverage.spatialBurkina Fasoen
dc.coverage.spatialAfghanistanen
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-21T12:29:40Z
dc.date.available2018-12-21T12:29:40Z
dc.date.issued2018-09
dc.identifier.citationMikulak, M. (2018). Cost-effectiveness in humanitarian work: cash-based programming. K4D Helpdesk. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studiesen
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/14215
dc.description.abstractThere is consensus in the literature that giving people cash in humanitarian contexts provides greater choice and dignity while at the same time stimulating local markets. In comparison to in-kind approaches, cash emerges as more efficient to deliver and – depending on the particularities of a given context – it can also be equally or at times more effective at delivering the desired outcomes when compared to in-kind assistance and vouchers. The evidence presented in this literature review demonstrates that cash based responses are value for money with respect to improving humanitarian outcomes and reducing the cost of the response. In particular, unconditional cash transfers allow people to buy the goods and services they need through local markets and are also characterised by flexibility that would be hard to match through in-kind responses (ECHO, 2016). Cash based responses also produce gains for local economies and the effectiveness of cash and in-kind transfers are generally considered to be similar. While the effectiveness of cash and in-kind is similar, the efficiency is generally in favour of cash (WB, 2016). Cost efficiency of CBR is improved in particular once programmes are at scale (WB, 2016) although the operating context can significantly influence cost efficiency. Overall, efficiency values for CBR were lowest in complex emergencies, followed by slow onset natural disasters (e.g. drought), then rapid onset natural disasters (e.g. other extreme weather events, earthquakes) and highest in refugee responses (WB, 2016). Technological advances also drive the cost efficiency of CBR. Some evidence shows that there are few differences in impacts based on the number of instalments used to deliver a programme (UNICEF, 2017). The evidence reviewed also points to the limits of CBR; cash interventions are unable to tackle systemic issues around quality of service provision, education and largely also health (albeit they can help cover costs of dealing with small ailments, or channel some resources into the WASH sector (ODI, 2017; UNCHR, 2018b). CBR cannot address legal and policy issues that often constrain livelihoods or access to services, particularly for refugees, such as the right to work or access to national health and education systems, CBR are also not a substitute for technical skills and support (UNCHR, 2018b).en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherIDSen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesK4D Helpdesk Report;458
dc.rights.urihttps://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/en
dc.subjectAiden
dc.subjectDevelopment Policyen
dc.subjectFinanceen
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.subjectNutritionen
dc.subjectPopulationen
dc.titleCost-Effectiveness in Humanitarian Work: Cash-Based Programmingen
dc.typeOtheren
dc.rights.holder© DFID - Crown copyright 2018.en
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-09
rioxxterms.funderDepartment for International Development, UK Governmenten
rioxxterms.identifier.projectK4Den
rioxxterms.versionVoRen
rioxxterms.funder.project238a9fa4-fe4a-4380-996b-995f33607ba0en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • K4D [619]
    K4D supports learning and the use of evidence to improve the impact of development policy and programmes. The programme is designed to assist DFID and other partners to be innovative and responsive to rapidly changing and complex development challenges.

Show simple item record