Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWalker, Robert
dc.contributor.authorChase, Elaine
dc.contributor.authorLødemel, Ivar
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-24T12:55:41Z
dc.date.available2017-03-24T12:55:41Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationWalker, R., Chase, E. and Lødemel, I. (2012) The indignity of the Welfare Reform Act. Child Poverty Action Group, Issue 143, pp. 9-12.
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/12912
dc.description.abstractAt the 101st session of its conference in June this year, the International Labour Organization agreed Recommendation 202 on national social protection floors. Esoteric though it sounds, this sets standard that has the potential to require the radical upgrading of the British social security system. Robert Walker, Elaine Chase and Ivar Lødemel provide an overview of the Recommendation’s context, and argue why its rights-based approach and emphasis on dignity matter to UK anti-poverty programmes.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCPAG Ltd
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectEconomic Development
dc.subjectRural Development
dc.subjectIndustrial Development
dc.subjectImpact Innovation
dc.subjectScience and Society
dc.titleThe indignity of the Welfare Reform Act
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderCPAG Ltd
dc.identifier.externalurihttp://www.cpag.org.uk/content/indignity-welfare-reform-act
dc.identifier.externalurihttps://doi.org/10.35648/20.500.12413/11781/ii270
dc.identifier.agES/H034307/1, RES-167-25-0557
dc.identifier.agEPD/102
dc.identifier.doi10.35648/20.500.12413/11781/ii270


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/