dc.contributor.author | Huff, Amber | |
dc.coverage.spatial | Madagascar | en |
dc.coverage.spatial | South Africa | en |
dc.coverage.spatial | Tanzania | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-11T13:07:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-09-11T13:07:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Huff, A. (2015) Green Development, Natural Resource Financialization and Emerging Conflict in Southern Africa with Examples from Implementation Contexts in Madagascar, Tanzania and South Africa, IDS Evidence Report 148, Brighton: IDS | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/6936 | |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, widespread uncertainty around global economic and environmental futures has contributed to growing advocacy for a global ‘greening’ of the economy involving the coordinated establishment of pro-environment economic policies and programmes around the world (Barbier 2010; UNDESA 2009). Following the dominant framings favoured by the United Nations (UN) and partners, the term ‘green economy’ refers to a flexible policy toolkit that includes recommendations for environmental regulations, market-based and financial instruments, and voluntary initiatives to promote capitalisation of pro-environment goods and services and stimulate green economic growth (UNEMG 2011). Along these lines, a number of UN-affiliated international and regional intergovernmental organisations and development banks have developed their own complementary green growth strategies and frameworks that link up with the UN approach through a number of collaborations, agreements, mechanisms and partnerships (AfDB 2014; Fay 2012; UNDESA 2013). In this report, the terms ‘green economy’ and ‘green growth’ are used at times to reference the same thing – to refer to the common dominant principles of these approaches, namely:
Environmentally sustainable economic growth – the idea that economic growth and environmental integrity can be complementary and achievable goals within the appropriate market and regulatory contexts
Socially inclusive green growth – the idea that green economic growth should be pro-poor and maximise both immediate and local benefits to reduce poverty and vulnerability and long-term global benefits towards sustainability
Universality – the idea that transitions to green economies should be universal to realise a cumulative global transition towards sustainability
Flexibility – there is no single green growth model; green economic strategies will vary by region and country based on context, capabilities, preferences and funding. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | UK Department for International Development | en |
dc.publisher | IDS | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | IDS Evidence Report;148 | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ | en |
dc.subject | Economic Development | en |
dc.subject | Environment | en |
dc.subject | Security and Conflict | en |
dc.title | Green Development, Natural Resource Financialization and Emerging Conflict in Southern Africa with Examples from Implementation Contexts in Madagascar, Tanzania and South Africa | en |
dc.type | IDS Evidence Report | en |
dc.rights.holder | IDS | en |
dc.identifier.ag | OT/11009/2/598 | |