dc.contributor.author | Walker, Robert | |
dc.contributor.author | Chase, Elaine | |
dc.contributor.author | Lødemel, Ivar | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-03-24T12:55:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-03-24T12:55:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Walker, R., Chase, E. and Lødemel, I. (2012) The indignity of the Welfare Reform Act. Child Poverty Action Group, Issue 143, pp. 9-12. | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/12912 | |
dc.description.abstract | At the 101st session of its conference in June this year, the International Labour Organization agreed Recommendation 202 on national social protection floors. Esoteric though it sounds, this sets standard that has the potential to require the radical upgrading of the British social security system. Robert Walker, Elaine Chase and Ivar Lødemel provide an overview of the Recommendation’s context, and argue why its rights-based approach and emphasis on dignity matter to UK anti-poverty programmes. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | CPAG Ltd | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | Economic Development | |
dc.subject | Rural Development | |
dc.subject | Industrial Development | |
dc.subject | Impact Innovation | |
dc.subject | Science and Society | |
dc.title | The indignity of the Welfare Reform Act | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.holder | CPAG Ltd | |
dc.identifier.externaluri | http://www.cpag.org.uk/content/indignity-welfare-reform-act | |
dc.identifier.externaluri | https://doi.org/10.35648/20.500.12413/11781/ii270 | |
dc.identifier.ag | ES/H034307/1, RES-167-25-0557 | |
dc.identifier.ag | EPD/102 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.35648/20.500.12413/11781/ii270 | |