Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPaina, Ligia
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, Annie
dc.contributor.authorTetui, Moses
dc.contributor.authorEkirapa-Kiracho, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorBarman, Debjani
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Tanvir
dc.contributor.authorShaila Mahmood, Shehrin
dc.contributor.authorBloom, Gerry
dc.contributor.authorKnezovich, Jeff
dc.contributor.authorGeorge, Asha
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Sara
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-08T09:07:38Z
dc.date.available2018-05-08T09:07:38Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-28
dc.identifier.citationPaina, L., Wilkinson, A., Tetui, M., Ekirapa-Kiracho, E., Barman, D., Ahmed, T., Shaila Mahmood, S., Bloom, G., Knezovich, J., George, A., Bennett, S. (2017) Using Theories of Change to inform implementation of health systems research and innovation: experiences of Future Health Systems consortium partners in Bangladesh, India and Uganda. Health Research Policy and Systems. 15 (Suppl 2):109en
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/13729
dc.description.abstractThe Theory of Change (ToC) is a management and evaluation tool supporting critical thinking in the design, implementation and evaluation of development programmes. We document the experience of Future Health Systems (FHS) Consortium research teams in Bangladesh, India and Uganda with using ToC. We seek to understand how and why ToCs were applied and to clarify how they facilitate the implementation of iterative intervention designs and stakeholder engagement in health systems research and strengthening. Methods: This paper combines literature on ToC, with a summary of reflections by FHS research members on the motivation, development, revision and use of the ToC, as well as on the benefits and challenges of the process. We describe three FHS teams’ experiences along four potential uses of ToCs, namely planning, communication, learning and accountability. Results: The three teams developed ToCs for planning and evaluation purposes as required for their initial plans for FHS in 2011 and revised them half-way through the project, based on assumptions informed by and adjusted through the teams’ experiences during the previous 2 years of implementation. All teams found that the revised ToCs and their accompanying narratives recognised greater feedback among intervention components and among key stakeholders. The ToC development and revision fostered channels for both internal and external communication, among research team members and with key stakeholders, respectively. The process of revising the ToCs challenged the teams’ initial assumptions based on new evidence and experience. In contrast, the ToCs were only minimally used for accountability purposes. Conclusions: The ToC development and revision process helped FHS research teams, and occasionally key local stakeholders, to reflect on and make their assumptions and mental models about their respective interventions explicit. Other projects using the ToC should allow time for revising and reflecting upon the ToCs, to recognise and document the adaptive nature of health systems, and to foster the time, space and flexibility that health systems strengthening programmes must have to learn from implementation and stakeholder engagement.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen
dc.rightsThe Author(s). 2017. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stateden
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectHealthen
dc.titleUsing Theories of Change to Inform Implementation of Health Systems Research and Innovation: Experiences of Future Health Systems Consortium Partners in Bangladesh, India and Ugandaen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.rights.holderThe authorsen
dc.identifier.externalurihttps://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12961-017-0272-yen
dc.identifier.teamHealth and Nutritionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0272-y
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-12-28
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen
rioxxterms.identifier.projectFuture Health Systemsen
rioxxterms.versionVoRen
rioxxterms.versionofrecordhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0272-yen
rioxxterms.funder.project50c0b576-b4b1-402e-a6cd-50d73c1d4430en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

The Author(s). 2017. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as The Author(s). 2017. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated