Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKabeer, Nailaen
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-24T16:00:49Z
dc.date.available2016-02-24T16:00:49Z
dc.date.issued01/01/1996en
dc.identifier.citationKabeer, N. (1996) Agency, Well-being & Inequality: Reflections on the Gender Dimensions of Poverty. IDS Bulletin 27(1): 11-21en
dc.identifier.issn1759-5436en
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/9256
dc.description.abstractSummary Despite their apparent gender-neutrality, most discussions of poverty have been premised on the concept of a male actor and of male-centred notions of well-being and agency. The assumption underpinning income/consumption and well-being measures is that shortfalls in income/consumption translate into shortfalls in choice, and are manifested in shortfalls in well-being. However, gender introduces disjunctures into this process, with the result that these measures inadequately capture women's experience of poverty. The basic conundrum that plagues attempts to conceptualize the gender dimensions of poverty stems from the operation of the forces that create scarcity, on the one hand, and discrimination, on the other. The form in which women's poverty manifests itself depends on the cultural context far more than it does for men, suggesting that it cannot be understood through the same conceptual lens.en
dc.format.extent11en
dc.publisherInstitute of Development Studiesen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIDS Bulletin Vol. 27 Nos. 1en
dc.rights.urihttp://www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/IDSOpenDocsStandardTermsOfUse.pdfen
dc.titleAgency, Well-being & Inequality: Reflections on the Gender Dimensions of Povertyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.rights.holder© 1996 Institue of Development Studiesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1759-5436.1996.mp27001002.xen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record