Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShaffer, Paulen
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-24T16:00:47Z
dc.date.available2016-02-24T16:00:47Z
dc.date.issued01/01/1996en
dc.identifier.citationShaffer, P. (1996) Beneath the Poverty Debate: Some Issues. IDS Bulletin 27(1): 23-35en
dc.identifier.issn1759-5436en
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/9255
dc.description.abstractSummaries Within development circles, two approaches to poverty have increasingly come into prominence: the income/consumption approach and the participatory appoach. It is argued that the different results which these two approaches generate with respect to both identification of the poor and policy prescription may be attributable to underlying philosophical differences. Specifically, underlying epistemological and ethical differences account for the different methodologies and conceptions of ill?being employed. When conflicting results are attributable to differing philosophical underpinnings no neat synthesis of results is possible. The real issue facing policy makers relates to the importance afforded the priorities and knowledge of the poor.en
dc.format.extent13en
dc.publisherInstitute of Development Studiesen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIDS Bulletin Vol. 27 Nos. 1en
dc.rights.urihttp://www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/IDSOpenDocsStandardTermsOfUse.pdfen
dc.titleBeneath the Poverty Debate: Some Issuesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.rights.holder© 1996 Institue of Development Studiesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1759-5436.1996.mp27001003.xen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record