Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTadros, Mariz
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-23T14:18:15Z
dc.date.available2011-05-23T14:18:15Z
dc.date.issued2010-09
dc.identifier.citationTadros, M. (2010) 'Advocacy in the Age of Authoritarianism: Adjustments of all Sorts in Egypt', IDS Working Paper 337, Brighton: IDSen_GB
dc.identifier.isbn978 1 85864 904 8
dc.identifier.urihttp://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/912
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines how advocacy, a highly political concept became a depoliticised technocratic buzzword for many donors, international and local NGOs. The focus of the paper is on the top-down introduction of advocacy in the Egyptian context in the 1990s as part of the bid to promote democratisation in the Arab world. It argues that in authoritarian contexts, participatory advocacy is inimical to the inhibitive policy environment and the nature of the political culture in place. The paper relies on a series of case studies involving donor-state-civil society interfaces in supporting advocacy. It draws in particular on the largest funding scheme to promote advocacy in the country, a USAID initiative involving a consortium of partners. It tracks the transformations that took place in order to convert advocacy into a ‘government-friendly’ form of engagement and reflects on the inherent tensions for donors backing a politicised form of development that clashes with their foreign policy. The paper argues that often advocacy NGOs are disembedded from the wider context due to a focus on the policy influence arena where they are expected to elicit change. Insufficient incentives to mobilise a constituency as well as a politically restrictive environment means that sometimes advocacy oriented initiatives or organisations ignore prompts from citizen groups engaged in contentious politics. Many advocacy NGOs engage in an elite way that impacts negatively on policies and on downward accountability towards a weak or nonexistent constituency. This not only has implications for their positionality in their contexts but also on the nature of policy demands made as well.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherInstitute of Development Studies (UK)en_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIDS Working Paper;337
dc.rights.urihttp://www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/IDSOpenDocsStandardTermsOfUse.pdfen_GB
dc.subjectGovernanceen_GB
dc.subjectPolitics and Poweren_GB
dc.titleAdvocacy in the age of authoritarianism: adjustments of all sorts in Egypten_GB
dc.typeIDS Working Paperen_GB
dc.rights.holderInstitute of Development Studiesen_GB
dc.identifier.externalurihttp://www.ids.ac.uk/go/idspublication/advocacy-in-the-age-of-authoritarianism-adjustments-of-all-sorts-in-egypt-wpen_GB
dc.identifier.blds312115


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record