Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChant, Sylviaen
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-01T14:45:51Z
dc.date.available2016-02-01T14:45:51Z
dc.date.issued01/04/2000en
dc.identifier.citationChant, S. (2000) From ‘Woman?Blind’ to ‘Man?Kind’. IDS Bulletin 31(2): 7-17en
dc.identifier.issn1759-5436en
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/8809
dc.description.abstractSummaries This article considers a series of conceptual, practical and strategic reasons why Gender and Development policy and planning might benefit from incorporating men to a greater degree than has been the case thus far. The article is divided into three main sections. The first sketches in some of the background to the emergence of interest in ‘men in GAD’. The second outlines some of the main problems associated with the exclusion of men from gender planning at institutional and grassroots levels. The third identifies how a more active and overt incorporation of men as gendered and engendering beings in gender policy and planning has the potential of expanding the scope of gender and development interventions, and of furthering struggles to achieve greater and more sustained equality between men and women.en
dc.format.extent11en
dc.publisherInstitute of Development Studiesen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIDS Bulletin Vol. 31 Nos. 2en
dc.rights.urihttp://www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/IDSOpenDocsStandardTermsOfUse.pdfen
dc.titleFrom ‘Woman?Blind’ to ‘Man?Kind’en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.rights.holder© 2000 Institue of Development Studiesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1759-5436.2000.mp31002002.xen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record