| dc.contributor.author | Chenoy, Anuradha M. | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-27T14:06:23Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-01-27T14:06:23Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 01/03/2009 | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | Chenoy, A., M. (2009) The Gender and Human Security Debate. IDS Bulletin 40(2): 44-49 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1759-5436 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/8134 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Feminists have welcomed the human security concept for the challenge it poses to national and state security but have faulted it for not adequately addressing women's issues. This article looks at the debate between feminists and human security theorists on the issue of gender, what impact these two discourses have on current thinking, and examines if these contradictions can be reconciled when enacting policy decisions. | en |
| dc.format.extent | 6 | en |
| dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd | en |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | IDS Bulletin Vol. 40 Nos. 2 | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/IDSOpenDocsStandardTermsOfUse.pdf | en |
| dc.title | The Gender and Human Security Debate | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| dc.rights.holder | © 2009 The Author. Journal compilation © Institute of Development Studies | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2009.00021.x | en |
