Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchatz, F
dc.contributor.authorWelle, K
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-25T10:58:42Z
dc.date.available2016-01-25T10:58:42Z
dc.date.issued2016-01
dc.identifier.citationSchatz, F. and Welle, K. (2016) 'Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Valuable Approach to Add to the Evaluator’s ‘Toolbox’? Lessons from Recent Applications', CDI Practice Paper 13, Brighton: IDSen
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/7997
dc.description.abstractA heightened focus on demonstrating development results has increased the stakes for evaluating impact (Stern 2015), while the more complex objectives and designs of international aid programmes make it ever more challenging to attribute effects to a particular intervention (Befani, Barnett and Stern 2014). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) is part of a new generation of approaches that go beyond the standard counterfactual logic in assessing causality and impact. Based on the lessons from three diverse applications of QCA, this CDI Practice Paper by Florian Schatz and Katharina Welle reflects on the potential of this approach for the impact evaluation toolbox.en
dc.description.sponsorshipUK Department for International Developmenten
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherIDSen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCDI Practice Paper;13
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/en
dc.titleQualitative Comparative Analysis: A Valuable Approach to Add to the Evaluator’s ‘Toolbox’? Lessons from Recent Applicationsen
dc.typeCDI Practice Paperen
dc.rights.holderIDS/CDIen
dc.identifier.agOT/11009/7/3/1/321


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/