Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSekhonyana, Eddie
dc.coverage.spatialZimbabwe.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-13T08:23:55Z
dc.date.available2015-07-13T08:23:55Z
dc.date.issued1991
dc.identifier.citationSekhonyana, E. (1991) The Propriety of Administration of Oaths and Affirmations by Prosecutors in the Magistrates Courts in Zimbabwe, ZLRev. vol. 9-10, (pp. 72-81), UZ, mt. Pleasant, Harare: Faculty of Law.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/6553
dc.descriptionA ZLRev article on the administration of oath by legal prosecutors in Zimbabwe's lower courts.en
dc.description.abstractThis article was mainly inspired by rather an anomalous but rampant practice by the magistrates in Zimbabwe of requiring prosecutors appearing before them to swear in witnesses. This practice is common at the Rotten Row and Tredgold magistrates courts. The position taken in this paper is that the prosecutor is unsuitable to administer oaths to witnesses appearing in his court simply because he has an interest in the outcome of the case. Swearing in of witnesses before leading evidence is part and parcel of the criminal justice system of many civilised countries including Zimbabwe.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherFaculty of Law, University of Zimbabwe (UZ)en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/en
dc.subjectGovernanceen
dc.subjectPolitics and Poweren
dc.subjectRightsen
dc.titleThe Propriety of Administration of Oaths and Affirmations by Prosecutors in the Magistrates Courts in Zimbabween
dc.typeArticleen
dc.rights.holderUniversity of Zimbabwe (UZ)en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/