Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChambers, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-07T14:33:27Z
dc.date.available2011-04-07T14:33:27Z
dc.date.issued2011-04-07
dc.identifier.urihttp://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/566
dc.descriptionAugust 2005en_GB
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, changes in participatory methodologies (PMs) may have been even more rapid than those in spatial technologies. Local people's abilities to make maps only became widely known and facilitated in the early 1990s. Participatory mapping has spread like a pandemic with many variants and applications not only in natural resource management but also in many other domains. With mapping as one element, there are now signs of a new pluralist eclecticism and creativity in PMs. The medium and means of mapping, whether ground, paper or GIS, and the style and mode of facilitation, influence who takes part, the nature of outcomes and power relationships. Much depends on the behaviour and attitudes of facilitators and who controls the process. Many ethical issues present troubling dilemmas, and lead to overarching questions about empowerment and ownership. Questions to be asked, again and again, are: Who is empowered and who disempowered? and Who gains and who loses?en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/80en_GB
dc.subjectParticipationen_GB
dc.titleParticipatory mapping for good changeen_GB
dc.typeOtheren_GB


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • The Robert Chambers Archive [415]
    A complete bibliography of Robert Chambers spanning four decades of research on participatory development.

Show simple item record