Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Aaron
dc.contributor.authorBaquero, Marcelo
dc.coverage.spatialBrazilen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-20T16:38:40Z
dc.date.available2014-06-20T16:38:40Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationSchneider, A. & M. Baquero (2006) Get what you want, give what you can : embedded public finance in Porto Alegre. Working paper series, 266. Brighton: IDS.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/4058
dc.description.abstractThe problem of public finance in Latin America is a structural contradiction. The historical pattern of insertion in the international economy creates a large number of poor who have very real material needs for public services, but they cannot individually or collectively contribute the funds to pay for them. Rich people hold wealth, but they are unwilling to contribute to public services that go to other groups while they turn to private schools, education and transportation. They are especially unwilling to hand over their wealth to governments perceived as corrupt, inefficient, and illegitimate. This raises a basic puzzle: how do governments provide for those in need while securing the compliance of those with wealth? In this context, the innovation of participatory budgeting is a striking example of embedded public finance in which taxes and expenditures are rooted in government legitimacy. Three elements comprise embedded public finance: l Democratic participation in which an increasing number of citizens participate in public decisions, and different groups, especially the poor, have been incorporated; l Progressive public spending in which investment in poor neighbourhoods has increased both in absolute terms and in relation to rich neighbourhoods; l Competent governance in which perceptions of corruption have decreased, and administrative structures riddled with clientelism and patronage have been reformed. These three elements rest atop a political coalition that joins middle sector and poor voters. Because these citizen groups have different needs, the state had to tailor the benefits it extended to the demands of each group. This strategy allowed the state to mobilise distinct contributions from each group, votes from the poor and tax compliance from those with wealth. Keywords: public finance, participatory budgeting, tax, Port Alegre, investment, public expenditure.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherIDSen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIDS working papers;266
dc.rights.urihttp://www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/IDSOpenDocsStandardTermsOfUse.pdfen_GB
dc.subjectFinanceen_GB
dc.subjectGovernanceen_GB
dc.subjectParticipationen_GB
dc.titleGet what you want, give what you can : embedded public finance in Porto Alegreen_GB
dc.typeIDS Working Paperen_GB
dc.rights.holderInstitute of Development Studiesen_GB
dc.identifier.koha157091


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record