Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBenell, Paul
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-14T17:06:34Z
dc.date.available2014-04-14T17:06:34Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.citationBennell, P. (1995) General Versus Vocational Secondary Education in Developing Countries: A Review of the Rates of Return Evidence. Working Paper Series, 23. Brighton: IDS.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/3803
dc.description.abstractThe purpose o f this short article is to examine critically the current orthodoxy concerning social rates o f returns to general and vocational secondary education in developing countries. Since George Psacharopoulos has been the prime mover in establishing this orthodoxy, we shall focus in particular on the rates o f return (henceforth ROR) evidence that he has brought to bear in support o f the basic proposition that the social profitability o f vocational secondary education is generally lower than for general secondary education. In addition, however, the evaluations o f Zymelman and Tilak will also be scrutinised (in chronological order) as well other, generally more recent comparative ROR studies that either were not or could not have been included in these three evaluations. It must be emphasised at the outset that the main objective o f this paper is to review research that makes explicit comparisons between the costs and benefits o f (specialist) vocational and general secondary education in any one country. There are many other studies o f school-based vocational education in its wide variety o f forms in developing countries which do not, however, attempt to compare in a systematic and rigorous manner the relative social profitability o f general and vocational secondary education. Thus, while some o f these studies do derive social and/or private RORs to specialist vocational secondary education (see, for example, Bennell, 1993 (Zimbabwe); Grootaert, 1988 (Cote d'Ivoire); Paul, 1990 (Togo and Cameroon); IBRD, 1990 (Bangladesh)), no equivalent RORs to general secondary education are presented. As will be discussed in more detail below, it is methodologically incorrect to use these ROR estimates in any comparative overview.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherIDSen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIDS working papers;23
dc.rights.urihttp://www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/IDSOpenDocsStandardTermsOfUse.pdfen_GB
dc.subjectChildren and Youthen_GB
dc.subjectEducationen_GB
dc.subjectWork and Labouren_GB
dc.titleGeneral Versus Vocational Secondary Education in Developing Countries: A Review of the Rates of Return Evidenceen_GB
dc.typeIDS Working Paperen_GB
dc.rights.holderInstitute of Development Studiesen_GB
dc.identifier.koha91662


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record