Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarnett, Chris
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-26T10:43:01Z
dc.date.available2013-09-26T10:43:01Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-26
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/2970
dc.description.abstractThis paper captures some recent challenges that emerged from establishing a baseline for an empowerment and accountability fund. It is widely accepted that producing a baseline is logical and largely uncontested – with the recent increased investment in baselines being largely something to be welcomed. This paper is therefore not a challenge to convention, but rather a note of caution: where adaptive programming is necessary, and there are multiple pathways to success, then the ‘baseline-endline’ survey tradition has its limitations. This is particularly so for interventions which seek to alter complex political-economic dynamics, such as between citizens and those in power.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIDS Practice Paper In Brief;12
dc.rightsReaders are encouraged to quote and reproduce material from issues of Practice Papers In Brief in their own publications. In return, IDS requests due acknowledgement and quotes to be referenced as above.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/IDSOpenDocsStandardTermsOfUse.pdfen_GB
dc.titleLearning about Measuring Advocacy and Policy Change: Are Baselines always Feasible and Desirable?en_GB
dc.typePractice Paper InBriefen_GB
dc.rights.holderInstitute of Development Studiesen_GB


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record