Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcCormick, Dorothy
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-23T15:25:41Z
dc.date.available2011-08-23T15:25:41Z
dc.date.issued1992
dc.identifier.citationMcCormick, Dorothy (1992), Why small firms stay small: risk and growth in Nairobi's small - scale manufacturing, Working paper no. 483, Nairobi: Institute for Development Studies, University of Nairobien_GB
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/1116
dc.description.abstractDespite abundant literature on the social and economic benefits of encouraging tiny "informal" firms, scholars generally agree that somewhat larger enterprises create more unskilled jobs, use resources more efficiently, and are better at building technological capacity. Yet the vast majority of firms will never grow beyond six workers. This paper argues that one very significant reason why small firms stay small is risk. In Nairobi — and probably elsewhere — the economic and social consequences of business failure are extremely high. Not surprisingly, entrepreneurs try to protect themselves from failure and, in the process, ensure that their firms will remain small. Our research identified four risk-management strategies that work separately and together to discourage firm growth. First, many entrepreneurs manage risk through flexibility. By working in rent-free quarters, using family labour and little capital, they minimise fixed costs and maximise opportunities for additional income. Second, many small manufacturers also avoid risk by manufacturing standard products for a known market. Third, successful entrepreneurs frequently diversify their income and assets rather than expand a single enterprise. Finally, moot prefer to preserve their land and other assets unencumbered by debt. These rational responses to risky business environment ensure that most firms will stay very small and, in the process, work against formation of a dynamic manufacturing sector. Policymakers are challenged to improve the enabling environment by creating broad policies conducive to firm growth and by targeting specific policies and programmes to small-scale industry. Kenya needs macroeconomic and social policies that indirectly encourage firm growth by removing or reducing business and background risks. The country also needs an industrial policy that provides positive incentives for enterprising business owners ready and willing to expand employment, improve efficiency, and upgrade their technology and their workers' skills.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherInstitute for Development Studies, University of Nairobien_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking papers;483
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/en_GB
dc.subjectIndustrial Developmenten_GB
dc.subjectDevelopment Policyen_GB
dc.titleWhy small firms stay small: risk and growth in Nairobi's small - scale manufacturingen_GB
dc.typeSeries paper (non-IDS)en_GB
dc.rights.holderInstitute for Development Studies, University of Nairobien_GB
dc.identifier.blds100242


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/