posted on 2024-09-05, 23:35authored byAaron Schneider
This paper contrasts two processes of governance reform that occurred in Brazil in the
1990s, one in relation to fiscal responsibility, the other in relation to tax. It illustrates that
the degree of institutional change possible depends on whether changes in the positions of
actors and their relative powers have occurred to the extent that a new social pact can be
built.
Brazil’s Fiscal Responsibility Law of 2000 followed on from a series of subtle but significant
shifts in the positions of actors and their relative powers, which produced a change in the
social pact supporting federal relations. This shift in the social pact allowed for a wholesale
change in federal institutions. Major changes in fiscal and administrative policy ensued, and
the outcome is that federal institutions have been imbued with greater capacity and
accountability.
The process of tax reform was similar, in that it occurred slowly and gradually. But the
social pact that supports the tax regime has changed only marginally. In this context, the
scope for institutional change was limited within the boundaries of existing institutions.
Policy changes that were implemented did lead to an increased tax take, but the tax system
remains inefficient and inequitable.
This paper highlights that although governance reforms can take multiple forms, wholesale
institutional change was a necessary prerequisite for an increase in the capacity and
accountability of government. Wholesale institutional change was only possible because of
the articulation of a new social pact.
Keywords: governance; fiscal policy; tax; institutions; Brazil.
History
Publisher
Institute of Development Studies
Citation
Schneider, A. (2006) Governance reform and institutional change in Brazil: fiscal responsibility and tax. Discussion paper series, 384. Brighton: IDS.