the Institute of Development Studies and partner organisations
Browse
- No file added yet -

Carrot or stick? : redistributive transfers versus policing in contexts of civil unrest

Download (290.22 kB)
report
posted on 2024-09-05, 23:15 authored by Patricia Justino
Recurrent episodes of civil unrest significantly reduce the potential for economic growth and poverty reduction. Yet the economics literature offers little understanding of what triggers civil unrest in society and how to prevent it. This paper provides a theoretical analysis in a dynamic setting of the merits of redistributive transfers in preventing the onset of (and reducing) civil unrest and compare it with policies of more direct intervention such as the use of police. We present empirical evidence for a panel of Indian states, where conflict, transfers and policing are treated as endogenous variables. Our empirical results show, in the medium-term, redistributive transfers are both a more successful and cost-effective means to reduce civil unrest. Policing is at best a short-term strategy. In the longer term, it may trigger further social discontent. Keywords: transfers; policing; conflict; unrest, India; panel data.

History

Publisher

IDS

Citation

Justino, P. (2011) Carrot or stick? : redistributive transfers versus policing in contexts of civil unrest. Working paper series, 382. Brighton: IDS.

Series

IDS working papers 382

IDS Item Types

IDS Working Paper

Copyright holder

Institute of Development Studies

Country

India

Language

en

Usage metrics

    @ IDS Research

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC