The Institute of Development Studies and Partner Organisations
Browse

Balancing Inclusiveness, Rigour and Feasibility: Insights from Participatory Impact Evaluations in Ghana and Vietnam

Download (188.57 kB)
report
posted on 2024-09-06, 05:10 authored by A Van Hemelrijck, I Guijt
This paper by Adinda Van Hemelrijck and Irene Guijt explores how impact evaluation can live up to standards broader than statistical rigour in ways that address challenges of complexity and enable stakeholders to engage meaningfully. A Participatory Impact Assessment and Learning Approach (PIALA) was piloted to assess and debate the impacts on rural poverty of two government programmes in Vietnam and Ghana funded by the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). We discuss the trade-offs between rigour, inclusiveness and feasibility encountered in these two pilots. Trade-offs occur in every impact evaluation aiming for more than reductionist rigour, but the pilots suggest that they can be reduced by building sufficient research and learning capacity.

Funding

UK Department for International Development

History

Publisher

IDS

Citation

Van Hemelrijck, A. and Guijt, I. (2016) Balancing Inclusiveness, Rigour and Feasibility: Insights from Participatory Impact Evaluations in Ghana and Vietnam, CDI Practice Paper 14, Brighton: IDS

Series

CDI Practice Paper 14

IDS Item Types

CDI Practice Paper

Copyright holder

IDS

Country

Vietnam; Ghana

Language

en

Usage metrics

    Strengthening Evidence Based Policy - Policy Anticipation, Response and Evaluation

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC