the Institute of Development Studies and partner organisations
Browse
DOCUMENT
DigitalRightsinClosingCivicSpaceLessonsfromTenAfricanCountries.pdf (1.74 MB)
DOCUMENT
Introduction.pdf (277.49 kB)
DOCUMENT
ZimbabweReport.pdf (145.36 kB)
DOCUMENT
ZambiaReport.pdf (173.47 kB)
DOCUMENT
UgandaReport.pdf (161.96 kB)
DOCUMENT
SudanReport.pdf (156.46 kB)
DOCUMENT
SouthAfricaReport.pdf (160.67 kB)
DOCUMENT
NigeriaReport.pdf (189.11 kB)
DOCUMENT
KenyaReport.pdf (146.87 kB)
DOCUMENT
EthiopiaReport.pdf (169.66 kB)
DOCUMENT
EgyptReport.pdf (161.47 kB)
DOCUMENT
CameroonReport.pdf (173.3 kB)
1/0
12 files

Digital Rights in Closing Civic Space: Lessons from Ten African Countries

online resource
posted on 2024-09-05, 21:02 authored by Tony Roberts, Abrar Mohamed Ali, George Karekwaivanane, Natasha Msonza, Sam Phiri, Zorro, Juliet Nanfuka, Tanja Bosch, Oyewole Oladapo, Ayo Ojebode, Nanjala Nyabola, Iginio Gagliardone, Atnafu Brhane, Mohamed Farahat, Kathleen Ndongmo
This report introduces findings from ten digital rights landscape country reports on Zimbabwe, Zambia, Uganda, Sudan, South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya, Ethiopia, Egypt, and Cameroon. They analyse how the openings and closings of online civic space affect citizens’ digital rights. They show that: (1) when civic space closes offline citizens often respond by opening civic space online; (2) when civic space opens online governments often take measures to close online space; and (3) the resulting reduction in digital rights makes it impossible to achieve the kind of inclusive governance defined in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We know far more about openings and closings of online civic space in the global North than we do in the global South. What little we do know about Africa is mainly about a single country, a single event, or single technology. For the first time, these reports make possible a comparative analysis of openings and closings of online civic space in Africa. They document 65 examples of the use of digital technologies to open online civic space and 115 examples of techniques used to close online civic space. The five tactics used most often to close online civic space in Africa are digital surveillance, disinformation, internet shutdowns, legislation, and arrests for online speech. The reports show clearly that any comprehensive analysis of digital rights requires consideration of the wider political, civic space, and technological contexts. We argue that countering the threats to democracy and digital rights discussed in the reports requires new evidence, awareness, and capacity. We propose applied research to build capacity in each country to effectively monitor, analyse, and counter the insidious impact of surveillance and disinformation; and a programme to raise awareness and mobilise opinion to open civic space and improve citizens’ ability to exercise, defend, and expand their digital rights.

Funding

UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF)

History

Publisher

Institute of Development Studies

Citation

Ndongmo, K. (2021) ‘Cameroon Digital Rights Landscape Report’, in T. Roberts (ed.), Digital Rights in Closing Civic Space: Lessons from Ten African Countries, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, DOI: 10.19088/IDS.2021.015 Nanfuka, J. (2021) ‘Uganda Digital Rights Landscape Report’, in T. Roberts (ed.), Digital Rights in Closing Civic Space: Lessons from Ten African Countries, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, DOI: 10.19088/IDS.2021.008 Roberts, T. and Mohamed Ali, A. (2021) ‘Opening and Closing Online Civic Space in Africa: An Introduction to the Ten Digital Rights Landscape Reports’, in T. Roberts (ed.), Digital Rights in Closing Civic Space: Lessons from Ten African Countries, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, DOI: 10.19088/IDS.2021.005 Nyabola, N. (2021) ‘Kenya Digital Rights Landscape Report’, in T. Roberts (ed.), Digital Rights in Closing Civic Space: Lessons from Ten African Countries, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, DOI: 10.19088/IDS.2021.012 Gagliardone, I. and Brhane, A. (2021) ‘Ethiopia Digital Rights Landscape Report’, in T. Roberts (ed.), Digital Rights in Closing Civic Space: Lessons from Ten African Countries, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, DOI: 10.19088/IDS.2021.013 Farahat, M. (2021) ‘Egypt Digital Rights Landscape Report’, in T. Roberts (ed.), Digital Rights in Closing Civic Space: Lessons from Ten African Countries, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, DOI: 10.19088/IDS.2021.014 Roberts, T. (ed.) (2021) Digital Rights in Closing Civic Space: Lessons from Ten African Countries, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, DOI: 10.19088/IDS.2021.003 Phiri, S. and Zorro (2021) ‘Zambia Digital Rights Landscape Report’, in T. Roberts (ed.), Digital Rights in Closing Civic Space: Lessons from Ten African Countries, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, DOI: 10.19088/IDS.2021.007 Karekwaivanane, G. and Msonza, N. (2021) ‘Zimbabwe Digital Rights Landscape Report’, in T. Roberts (ed.), Digital Rights in Closing Civic Space: Lessons from Ten African Countries, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, DOI: 10.19088/IDS.2021.006 Mohamed Ali, A. (2021) ‘Sudan Digital Rights Landscape Report’, in T. Roberts (ed.), Digital Rights in Closing Civic Space: Lessons from Ten African Countries, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, DOI: 10.19088/IDS.2021.009 Oladapo, O. and Ojebode, A. (2021) ‘Nigeria Digital Rights Landscape Report’, in T. Roberts (ed.), Digital Rights in Closing Civic Space: Lessons from Ten African Countries, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, DOI: 10.19088/IDS.2021.011 Bosch, T. and Roberts, T. (2021) ‘South Africa Digital Rights Landscape Report’, in T. Roberts (ed.), Digital Rights in Closing Civic Space: Lessons from Ten African Countries, Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, DOI: 10.19088/IDS.2021.010

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Copyright holder

© Authors © Institute of Development Studies 2021

Country

Ethiopia; Zimbabwe; Kenya; Nigeria; Cameroon; South Africa; Uganda; Zambia; Sudan; Egypt

Language

en

IDS team

Digital

Project identifier

Default project::9ce4e4dc-26e9-4d78-96e9-15e4dcac0642::600

Usage metrics

    @ IDS Research

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC