the Institute of Development Studies and partner organisations
Browse
- No file added yet -

The Sorry State of M&E in Agriculture: Can People-centred Approaches Help?

Download (315.02 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-09-06, 05:27 authored by Lawrence Haddad, Johanna Lindstrom, Yvonne Pinto
This article argues that if the multiple purposes of M&E were recognised and pursued it would help align the incentives of funders, implementers, M&E service providers, and intended beneficiaries to increase the impacts of agriculture on poverty. In reality, these multiple purposes are rarely pursued, leading to the weak provision of meaningful M&E. We make the case that M&E in agriculture is not immune to this, and it may even be more susceptible due to agriculture's unique properties. We argue that one possible way forward is people?centred M&E, which looks for ways to balance multiple accountabilities. People?centred M&E embraces farmer feedback, focuses on incentivising learning within organisations and finds ways to share M&E information more openly.

History

Publisher

Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Citation

Haddad, L., Lindstrom, J. and Pinto, Y. (2010) The Sorry State of M&E in Agriculture: Can People-centred Approaches Help?. IDS Bulletin 41(6): 6-25

Series

IDS Bulletin Vol. 41 Nos. 6

IDS Item Types

Article

Copyright holder

© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © Institute of Development Studies

Usage metrics

    Volume 41. Issue 6: People-centred M&E: Aligning Incentives So Agriculture Does More to Reduce Hunger

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC