the Institute of Development Studies and partner organisations
Browse
- No file added yet -

Socioeconomic development as an intervention against malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Download (891.05 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-09-05, 22:31 authored by John Thompson, Lucy S Tusting, Barbara Willey, Henry Lucas, Hmooda T Kafy, Richard Smith, Steve W Lindsay
Background Future progress in tacking malaria mortality will probably be hampered by the development of resistance to drugs and insecticides and by the contraction of aid budgets. Historically, control was often achieved without malariaspecific interventions. Our aim was to assess whether socioeconomic development can contribute to malaria control. Methods We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether the risk of malaria in children aged 0–15 years is associated with socioeconomic status. We searched Medline, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Campbell Library, the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Health Systems Evidence, and the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre evidence library for studies published in English between Jan 1, 1980, and July 12, 2011, that measured socioeconomic status and parasitologically confirmed malaria or clinical malaria in children. Unadjusted and adjusted effect estimates were combined in fixedeffects and random-effects meta-analyses, with a subgroup analysis for different measures of socioeconomic status. We used funnel plots and Egger’s linear regression to test for publication bias. Findings Of 4696 studies reviewed, 20 met the criteria for inclusion in the qualitative analysis, and 15 of these reported the necessary data for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The odds of malaria infection were higher in the poorest children than in the least poor children (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 1∙66, 95% CI 1∙35–2∙05, p<0∙001, I²=68%; adjusted OR 2∙06, 1∙42–2∙97, p<0∙001, I²=63%), an effect that was consistent across subgroups.Interpretation Although we would not recommend discontinuation of existing malaria control efforts, we believe that increased investment in interventions to support socioeconomic development is warranted, since such interventions could prove highly effective and sustainable against malaria in the long term.

Funding

DFID

History

Publisher

Elsevier

Citation

Tusting, Lucy S., et al. "Socioeconomic development as an intervention against malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis." The Lancet 382.9896 (2013): 963-972.

IDS Item Types

Article

Copyright holder

The Lancet (Elsevier)

Language

en

IDS team

Knowledge Technology and Society

Identifier ISSN

2379-0353

Usage metrics

    ESRC STEPS Centre

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC