posted on 2024-09-05, 21:34authored byLynnette M Neufeld, Stella Nordhagen, Jef L Leroy, Noora-Lisa Aberman, Inka Barnett, Eric Djimeu Wouabe, Amy Webb Girard, Wendy Gonzalez, Carol E Levin, Mduduzi NN Mbuya, Eduardo Nakasone, Christina Nyhus Dhillon, Dave Prescott, Matt Smith, David Tschirley
Although there is growing global momentum behind food systems strategies to improve planetary and human health—including nutrition—there is limited evidence of what types of food systems interventions work. Evaluating these types of interventions is challenging due to their complex and dynamic nature and lack of fit with standard evaluation methods. In this article, we draw on a portfolio of 6 evaluations of food systems interventions in Africa and South Asia that were intended to improve nutrition. We identify key methodological challenges and formulate recommendations to improve the quality of such studies. We highlight 5 challenges: a lack of evidence base to justify the intervention, the dynamic and multifaceted nature of the interventions, addressing attribution, collecting or accessing accurate and timely data, and defining and measuring appropriate outcomes. In addition to more specific guidance, we identify 6 cross-cutting recommendations, including a need to use multiple and diverse methods and flexible designs. We also note that these evaluation challenges present opportunities to develop new methods and highlight several specific needs in this space.
Funding
Default funder
History
Publisher
Elsevier
Citation
Neufeld, L.; Nordhagen, S. and Leroy, J.L. et al (2024) 'Food Systems Interventions for Nutrition: Lessons from 6 Program Evaluations in Africa and South Asia', The Journal of Nutrition, DOI:10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.04.005