The Institute of Development Studies and Partner Organisations
Browse

Commentary on ‘The Sorry State of M&E in Agriculture: Can People?centred Approaches Help?’

Download (82.85 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-09-06, 05:28 authored by Zenda Ofir
In their article, Haddad, Lindstrom and Pinto highlight some of the most critical issues facing monitoring and evaluation today, not only in agriculture but across many fields of endeavour. Their rationale and call for better M&E, ‘people?centred M&E’ and ensuring that the multiple benefits of M&E are captured in the increasingly important agricultural sector is convincing, welcome and timely. However, these approaches will resolve only some of the issues that need to be addressed if M&E is to make a real difference in agriculture for development. A concerted effort with a stronger focus on larger systems within and beyond agriculture, novel practices and innovation in M&E will be needed. Will the M&E profession – especially in developing countries – rise to the challenge?

History

Publisher

Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Citation

Ofir, Z. (2010) Commentary on ‘The Sorry State of M&E in Agriculture: Can People?centred Approaches Help?’. IDS Bulletin 41(6): 26-27

Series

IDS Bulletin Vol. 41 Nos. 6

IDS Item Types

Article

Copyright holder

© 2010 The Author. Journal compilation © Institute of Development Studies

Usage metrics

    Volume 41. Issue 6: People-centred M&E: Aligning Incentives So Agriculture Does More to Reduce Hunger

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC