dc.contributor.author | Picciotto, Robert | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-04T16:39:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-01-04T16:39:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | November 2014 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Picciotto, R. (2014) Have Development Evaluators Been Fighting the Last War… And If So, What is to be Done?. IDS Bulletin 45(6): 6-16 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1759-5436 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/7349 | |
dc.description.abstract | What are the right evaluation methods and what evaluation strategy adapted to contemporary development issues should such methods serve? This article argues that a range of methods and tools must be drawn upon to achieve high?quality evaluation standards and that even the best methods cannot compensate for a misguided strategy. For both sets of reasons, it is time for the current craze for experimental evaluation methods in international development to give way. In its place a mix of evaluation methods informed by a relevant evaluation research agenda should be adopted and put at the service of evaluation policy directions that reflect contemporary development prospects and dilemmas. | en |
dc.format.extent | 11 | en |
dc.publisher | © 2014 Institute of Development Studies | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | IDS Bulletin Vol. 45 Nos. 6 | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/IDSOpenDocsStandardTermsOfUse.pdf | en |
dc.title | Have Development Evaluators Been Fighting the Last War… And If So, What is to be Done? | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
dc.rights.holder | © 2013 The Author. IDS Bulletin © 2013 Institute of Development Studies | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/1759-5436.12109 | en |