Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDurst, Michael C.
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-31T08:51:22Z
dc.date.available2023-07-31T08:51:22Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-17
dc.identifier.citationDurst, M. C. (2023) BEPS, Pillar 2, and the Replacement of Tax-Based Incentives With Nontax Incentives', Taxnotes International, Volume 110, Number 16en
dc.identifier.urihttps://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/18063
dc.description.abstractThe 15 percent minimum tax will reduce the appeal of both the implicit investment incentives made available by BEPS planning and the explicit tax-based incentives that countries provide through measures like tax holidays.4 Pressure of Tax Competition The pillar 2 proposal can best be understood as an attempt to limit the pressures of tax competition on governments by reducing the extent to which all countries can lower their ETRs, even if they wish to do so.5 The reduction of tax competition is intended to enable countries to reach a more desirable policy balance, regarding ETRs, than the balance that countries can achieve when faced by the pressures of today’s level of tax competition.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTax Analystsen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTaxnotes International; Volume 110, Number 16
dc.subjectFinanceen
dc.titleBEPS, Pillar 2, and the Replacement of Tax-Based Incentives With Nontax Incentivesen
dc.typeOtheren
dc.rights.holder© copyright 2023 Michael C. Durst. All rights reserved / © 2023 Tax Analysts. All rights reserved.en
rioxxterms.versionVoRen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record